Hope Heart Institute scientists announce the source of "healing cells" in artificial arteries in May 1995.

  • By Cassandra Tate
  • Posted 5/23/2006
  • HistoryLink.org Essay 7770
In May 1995, scientists from Seattle's Hope Heart Institute publish the results of studies proving that so-called “healing cells” found on the inside walls of artificial arteries come from the bloodstream, not from neighboring tissues as was previously believed. Further research will show that the cells are a type of stem cell, called “progenitor cells,” generated by bone marrow.

It had long been known that endothelial cells (thin, flat cells that form the interior layer of the entire circulatory system, from the heart to the tiniest capillaries) accumulate inside prosthetic arteries, where they play a crucial role in the healing process. Microfilaments in the endothelial layer, in both natural and artificial arteries, help the vessels withstand the shear stress of blood flow.

Surgeons prefer to use a segment of vein taken from elsewhere in a patient’s body when it is necessary to create a detour around a natural artery that has become clogged with plaque. When a natural vein is not available, vessels made of synthetic fabric are used as substitute grafts. Dr. Lester R. Sauvage, founder of the Hope Heart Institute in Seattle, was a pioneer in the development of artificial vessels. The Sauvage graft, made of Dacron and patented in 1971, is still widely used in cardiovascular surgery.

Like most other researchers, Sauvage assumed that the grafts worked because the porosity of the knitted polyester fabric allowed endothelial cells to migrate easily from adjacent tissues. The "through-wall" theory was the most widely accepted explanation of the healing mechanism. The "pannus" (for flap) theory held that the cells moved into the graft from the two ends of the natural blood vessel into which it had been placed.

In the early 1990s, Hope Institute scientists Qun Shi and Moses Hong-De Wu began to look more carefully at the source of the cells. In one experiment, they covered the outer surface of artificial arteries with silicone rubber, which endothelial cells could not penetrate. The arteries were then implanted in animals. If there were no cells in the arteries after removal, it would prove that the source was outside the grafts.

But the protective cells did show up inside the rubberized arteries. That set off what medical writer Warren King called "a cellular detective hunt." Dr. Arlene Wechezak, director of cell biology at the Hope, directed the first part of the search. As King explained it: "Endothelial cells bound to plastic were exposed to flowing laboratory nutrients -- mimicking blood flow. The cells not only divided, but the new cells moved downstream and stuck to new parts of the plastic" (The Seattle Times). The researchers concluded that similar mechanics were at work in the Dacron arteries.

In an article published in the May 1995 issue of the Journal of Vascular Surgery, Wu and Shi and their colleagues at the Hope announced that they had found "definitive proof" that the cells came from the bloodstream, and not from either the surrounding tissues or from the ends of the graft. A long graft that had been implanted in the upper thigh of a 65-year-old patient had had to be removed after 26 months because of an accumulation of fluid around the graft. Examining the graft, the researchers found endothelial cells in areas far removed from natural vessels.

Dr. William P. Hammond, associate medical director of the Hope, and scientists at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle speculated that the bone marrow, which produces other blood cells, could also be the source of the endothelial cells. Hutchinson scientists Rainer Storb and Cong Yu performed an experiment that tested the theory. Bone marrow from one dog was transplanted into another and identified by DNA typing. Eight months later, a Dacron graft (treated with silicone to make it impervious) was implanted into one dog. When the graft was removed, the scientists found that is contained endothelial cells from both animals.

"We had been talking about it for 33 years, saying they were coming through the wall," said Sauvage. "But we proved ourselves wrong, and that was a great accomplishment" (The Seattle Times).

Sources: Sources: Moses Hong-De Wu, Qun Shi, et al., "Definitive Proof of Endothelialization of a Dacron Arterial Prosthesis in a Human Being," Journal of Vascular Surgery, May 1995, pp. 862-67; Qun Shi, et al. "Evidence for Circulating Bone Marrow-Derived Endothelial Cells," Blood, July 15, 1998, pp. 362-67; Warren King, "It’s in the Blood -- Even Artificial Arteries Collect Healing Cells, Local Scientists Believe," The Seattle Times, September 3, 1996, p. A-8.

Licensing: This essay is licensed under a Creative Commons license that encourages reproduction with attribution. Credit should be given to both HistoryLink.org and to the author, and sources must be included with any reproduction. Click the icon for more info. Please note that this Creative Commons license applies to text only, and not to images. For more information regarding individual photos or images, please contact the source noted in the image credit.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
Major Support for HistoryLink.org Provided By: The State of Washington | Patsy Bullitt Collins | Paul G. Allen Family Foundation | Museum Of History & Industry | 4Culture (King County Lodging Tax Revenue) | City of Seattle | City of Bellevue | City of Tacoma | King County | The Peach Foundation | Microsoft Corporation, Other Public and Private Sponsors and Visitors Like You