1910 年 6 月 7 日,华盛顿州高级法院法官博伊德 J. 托曼维持法律裁决,即塞缪尔•斯通和他的妻子苏西•斯通这对富有的黑人夫妇,可以在排外的芒特贝克公园区 (Mount Baker Park District) 购买房产。园区开发商亨特地产开发公司 (Hunter Tract Improvement Company) 起诉斯通夫妇和此地产原所有者,要求撤销购买合同。开发商声称,因为斯通夫妇的肤色问题,会降低此地产及周边地产的价值。在原诉讼案和此上诉中获胜后,斯 通夫妇在第 34 南大街 (Avenue S) 3125 号建造自己的家园,但此诉讼案件表明了反抗制度性歧视(包括限制性条款)的需求日益增长。
1910 年 6 月 7 日,塞缪尔和苏西斯通赢得了在西雅图排外的芒特贝克区居住权利的诉讼
- By Kathleen Kemezis
- Posted 9/08/2010
- HistoryLink.org Essay 9570
Sources:
Richard Berner, Seattle in the 20th Century, Vol. 1 (Seattle: Charles Press, 1991); Esther Hall Mumford, Calabash: A Guide to the History, Culture, and Art of African Americans in Seattle and King County (Seattle: Anase Press, 1993); Shaping Seattle Architecture ed by Jeffrey Ochsner (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1994); Quintard Taylor, The Forging of a Black Community: Seattle’s Central District, from 1870 through the Civil Rights Era (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1994); Esther Hall Mumford, "Seattle's Black Victorians -- Revising a City's History," Portage Vol. 2, No. 1 (1980-1981), p. 14-17; HistoryLink.org Online Encyclopedia of Washington State History, “Seattle Neigborhood: Mount Baker -- Thumbnail History” (by Junius Rochester), http://historylink.org/ (accessed July 1, 2010); Carol Tobin, "Mount Baker Historic Context Statement," May 1994, City of Seattle, Department of Neighborhoods; “Another Phase of Negrophobia,” Seattle Republican, November 9, 1910, p. 1; Horace Roscoe Cayton and Ed Diaz, Horace Roscoe Cayton: Selected Writings (Seattle: Bridgewater-Collins, Publisher, 2003), 60; “Only The Negro Not Wanted,” Seattle Republican, April 9, 1909, p. 5; “Negress Wins Suit in Highest Court,” The Seattle Daily Times, June 8, 1910; “Negroes May Carry Case to Washington,” Seattle Daily Times, November 29, 1909, p. 6; “Wife of Prominent Negro in Seattle,” Seattle Daily Times, September 14, 1909, p. 9; Hunter Tract Improvement Co. v. Stone et al, 109 P 112 (1910).